Categories
Opinion/Commentary

Did the ABC drag LGBTQ+ people through the mud for clickbait?

Image: Kokkal Ng, iStock

The ABC reported allegations that Year Nine girls at Renmark High School were exposed to references of ‘bestiality’ during a ‘Respectful Relationships’ class.

Female students claimed they were told to leave their current classes to attend a presentation. There was staff from Headspace, Berri.

One student, Courtney White, 14 said:

We had a teacher that told us to grab a chair and sit in front of the board, and then the Headspace people came in and then the Headspace people came in and then [the teacher] left, so, we’re sitting in front of a board alone with no teachers, just Headspace people.

Quick note: She’s only fourteen (apparently). The above quote (which is word for word from the ABC article) is weird. It sounds like the teacher abandoned them.

When I was in high school, teachers were always present at speeches, presentations, etc. So, why did the teachers in Renmark High leave them now?

Mentions of bestiality: what is the truth?

The biggest controversy was an alleged reference to bestiality. The way some commented on it, it sounds like zoophiles are included in the LGBTQ+ community.

Were LGBTQ+ people linked to zoophiles? What was the real context? According to a Reddit post:

Apparently, (according to the other sub), what happened was the presenter made a reference that years ago, LGBT people were compared to those who’d practice bestiality, (well, not that long ago as it was said during the marriage equality debate). Some of the young students in the audience misunderstood what that meant and by the time it got back to their parents, it had become a lecture on bestiality.

NoteChoice7719, 5 April 2024

Other Reddit users were confused what happened. Some even doubted the students’ accounts.

If NoteChoice7719 is correct, the presenter wasn’t completely wrong. During the same – sex marriage debate in 2016 – 2017, people argued that same – sex marriage would lead to acceptance of bestiality. That was so disgusting. Frankly, it didn’t need to be repeated.

When news got out, parents were outraged. According to The Mercury, at least one mother removed her three children from the school.

Renmark High School receives backlash and apologises

The backlash against was Renmark High School was swift. So was their response.

RHS Principal, Mat Evans admitted that the school was in the wrong. He assured parents that it was being investigated. In the meantime, the presenter has been suspended from all government schools.

He admitted students were uncomfortable during the presentation. He also expressed regret about not informing parents and that school staff weren’t present.

So, was the ABC wrong?

When I first researched for this story, I was so disappointed in the ABC. I thought they were throwing LGBTQ+ under the bus. However, I don’t think that now.

There seems to be confusion on exactly what was said at the presentation. However, it sounds like both Renmark High School and Headspace Berri was in the wrong. They shouldn’t have make the students uncomfortable. The Principal and parents should’ve been informed

To be fair, I’m willing to believe that the presenter didn’t mean to link the LGBTQ+ community to bestiality or other illegal activities. The ABC probably should have made that clearer.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary Uncategorized

Does Finland hold the answers for Australia’s early childhood education and care crisis?

Getty Images: iStock

Australia has an early childhood education and care crisis. Actually, there’s a number of crises.

Most parents and caregivers can’t afford not to work. Ironically, early childhood education can be so expensive, it makes working seem pointless.

There’s more.

Many Australian parents are finding it almost impossible to find spots for their children without waiting for a significant period of time.

Emma Douglas from Broome, Western Australia, told ABC’s 7.30:

[I’d] be posting on the Broome babysitting Facebook pages begging, begging, for a babysitter that could fit in with the days that I needed.

Douglas eventually gave up her job due to lack of available childcare. Fortunately after being in Broome for two years, Douglas was able to find a childcare place.

She said the childcare system: “doesn’t feel fair”.

Finland’s childcare system

Image: digograndi, iStock

Unlike Australia’s private childcare system, Finland’s childcare centres are run by local government. It’s also considered a right.

Professor of education at the University of Jyaskyla, Heidi Harji – Luukkainen explained:

So, in Finland, we have a subjective right for children to get early childhood education, which means that the parents are guaranteed placement for the child in early childhood education whenever there is a need.

Additionally, childcare fees aren’t blanket amounts. They’re dependent on a family’s income. Fees can range from A$50 to A$500 a month. In Australia, the system is a bit more complex.

Austalian governments have introduced childcare subsidies. In mid – to – late 2020, the Liberal National Party (LNP), ended JobKeeper for early childhood educators and rolled back free childcare for working families.

Lack of access

Another issue that Australian parents face is finding an early childhood education centre nearby.

Many parents, especially in Australia’s capital cities have to travel almost half an hour to take their child/ren to childcare. This creates stress on both the parents and children. They often have to leave home early in the morning and get home in the evening. Talk about a busy day!

In contrast, Finland has numerous early childhood education centres that are near enough for families.

The history of Finland’s early childhood education system

According to Jacobin, Finland’s successful early childhood education system didn’t happen overnight.

The first kindergarten was established in the capital, Helsinki in 1888. This was established for working -class families. Four years later, education for early childhood teachers began. Since 1995, most Finnish early childhood educators hold a degree. In Australia, the minimum qualification to work in early childhood education is Certificate III.

In 1919, Finnish municipalities were granted the right to establish early childhood education centres. Only a few took the offer. However, after World War Two, early childhood education was formalised.

In 1973, Finland’s government introduced the Child Daycare Act. This made childcare a right for Finnish children. This came about because childcare was only accessible to families who could afford or access it geographically (sound familiar?)

So, yes, Australia can learn from Finland. It’s all about priorities. Early childhood education needs to be considered a right to all children, not just a privilege for some.

What do you think? Should Australia try to adopt Finland’s esrly childhood education system? Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary

Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt sentenced for child abuse

Trigger warning: this post mentions child abuse and may be triggering for some readers. If this is true for you, please proceed with care.

On Wednesday, (Australian Eastern Daylight Time), a Utah judge sentenced Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt

The 8 Passengers’ matriarch was sentenced between four to sixty years imprisonment for aggravated child abuse. Hildebrandt was given the same sentence.

Late last year, Franke confessed to abusing her – then twelve -year – old son. She admitted to forcing him to work outside in late Spring to late Summer (May to August). Despite the heat, Franke’s son wasn’t given adequate water. He also suffered severe sunburns.

Franke also physically abused her son and bound his ankles and wrists with handcuffs and rope.

Franke then ‘treated’ the boy’s injuries with duct tape.

When the judge asked her plea, Franke said:

With my deepest regret and sorrow for my family and my children, guilty.

Franke treated her then – then nine – year. – old – daughter in similar ways.

Yet, Franke has had the gall to accuse one of her children of sexual abuse and calling her children ‘evil and posessed’. If the second statement isn’t an example of projection, I don’t know what is!

Franke’s sadistic nature was evident on ‘8 Passengers’

Image: contrastaddict, iStock

No one should be surprised with these charges. Ruby is sadistic and she hasn’t hid it.

As far back as 2020, viewers were disturbed over Franke’s overly – strictt parenting.

She treated her children horribly, all in the public eye.

Last year, reporters and commentators revealed that Franke forced her eldest son to sleep on a beanbag for seven months. In a video, the teenager revealed that he’d got in trouble for pranking his brother.

She refused to give her young daughter —who was six at the time — lunch at school. Why? Because the six – year – old daughter forgot to pack it.

In 2021, Franke announced that she and Kevin were giving two of their youngest children “the gift of truth” for Christmas. That’s code for nothing. These children weren’t even teenagers at this stage.

But wait, there’s more. Both children were used by toy companies to promote… toys for Christmas. You can’t make this stuff up!

Snail Galaxy started a petition calling for Child Protection Services (CPS) to investigate Franke’s treatment of the children. Unfortunately, it amassed less than three hundred signatures. But Franke was starting to get attention for all the wrong reasons.

YouTuber Josh Barbour has covered Franke’s cruelty on Dad Challenge Podcast for about three years.

Ex – LDS couple, Jordan and McKay has also spoken about Franke and Hildebrandt, especially Hildebrandt’s therapy practices.

Where to from here?

The imprisonment of Franke and Hildebrandt brings up many issues. One is exploitation of children online. The other is the danger of the ‘picture perfect’ image that family vloggers put across. It seems limke that the more ‘perfect’ a vlogger family seems, the more that they have to hide.

As social media users, the best we can do is stop falling for it. Stop watching family vlogs and other problematic creators. Fortunately, that’s starting to happen.

If this post brings up any issues for you and you’re in Australia, you can contact:

Lifeline: 13 11 14

Beyond Blue: 1300 224 636 or go on their webchat

Kids Helpline (for those between five and 25): 1800 55 1800 or their webchat

If you or anyone you know is in immediate danger, call 000 or your national emergency number.

Former 7News reporter swears to not sharing her children on social media

Image: 5./15 West

Earlier this year, cricketer David Warner and his wife Candice admitted to posting their three daughters online. The daughers — all under the age of ten at the time— had their own public Instagram account. The Warners bragged that they amassed over 162,000 followers.

At the time, I wrote a post criticising their announcement. The harms of public social media for children isn’t a secret.

Fortunately, some public figures are determined to protect their children. They want their children remain out of the public eye.

Kendall Gilding vows to keep young children out of public eye

Last month, former 7News reporter wrote on QWeekend about children and social media. She opened with a chilling introduction:

I walked into a cafe recently, saw a toddler and immediately thought, “Hey I know you!” Except I didn’t. “No, it must be your mum I know.”. Except I didn’t.

In some cases, this could be the start of a parasocial relationship. Parasocial relationships are relationships that are one – sided. Parasocial relationships are often sparked by the adoration a fan has for a celebrity.

More and more, this is extending to social media influencers and vloggers.

Luckily, Gilding knew the boundaries. She knew she didn’t know the baby or the mother who she’d seen on social media. She didn’t fantasise about the child being hers, or being close to her in some way.

This awareness spurred on Gilding to make an important decision.

Gilding claims she won’t share images of her children on social media

Gilding admitted that her son and daughter had been featured in magazines, newspapers and Instagram. However, she’s never been comfortable posting her children on Instagram.

She claims she’s very protective of her daughter, who was born through IVF after years of infertility. Instead of sharing her daughter’s face on Instagram, she opted to sharing her baby’s hand.

Who is following the children?

YouTuber, Josh Barbour has campaigned against family vloggers and kid influencers since 2020.

His main argument has always been that children can’t give informed consent having their lives publicly displayed on social media.

He’s also exposed who most often interacts with child influencers online — especially girls. And he’s found that a large percentage of millions of interactions are made by adult men. Everleigh Labrant/ Smith is a troubling example.

Not only are adult men seeking young girls’ conternt, they often make inappropriate comments.

Arttificial Intelligence (AI) and the Dark Web are other dangers that child influencers are exposed to. Children’s voices and images can be used in child abuse material.

Yes, ot’s dark and sick, But this is what parents need to grapple with in 2024.

It boils down to this: do you want to protect your children or not?

This is the heart of the issue, isn’t it? Do you want to protect your (or anyone’s) children or don’t you? Do you care about the safety of your children?

Naturally, most parents — most adults — want to protect children. But the rise of family vloggers and kid influencers proves that not all adults do. Especially when money i# involved.

Posting children’s images and identities on public social media isn’t safe. Remember I mentioned parasocial relationships earlier? They can be toxic. ‘Fans’ can suddenly turn on their former idols.

Parasocial relationships can become obsessive. This can make an influencer uneasy. And, at it’s worst, if a fan becomes obsessed and realises where an influencer lives, it can become dangerous. Children shouldn’t be exposed to that.

What do you think? Should parents stop posting their children on public social media? Should it be outlawed? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

Categories
various social issues

Cashless society hurting the homeless

Homeless person on street, holding handwritten sign saying ‘Help’ that’s underlined
Image: Ekkasit Jokthong, iStock

The ‘cashless society’ has had unintended consequences. According to the ABC, homeless people are finding harder to bet tge money they need to survive.

Morgan, a homeless man from Melbourne told the ABC that some passer – bys ask him his PayID when he asks for money. Some people buy him grocery gift cards, rather than him cash.

They usually go to a supermarket like Woolworths or Coles and buy me a gift card so that we can walk in and buy what we need.

Morgan prefers people giving cash. It helps people like him get what they need without restriction:

A lot of us like me [sic] haven’t got bank cards or EFTPOS cards to use [making us] really restricted from buying what we want and need.

Experts on homelesness agree. Monetary donations can be essential for a homeless person.

Impact of COVID-19

During the pandemic, the government offered homeless people temporary accommodation. Unfortunately, this ended when restrictions started being lifted.

To Morgan, it proved that the government can offer rough sleepers adequate accommodation if they want to.

A snapshot on homelessness in Australia

Adult and child’s hands holding blue paper house
Image: Sew reamStudio, iStock

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) offers a snapshot of homelessness.

However, there is little (if any) hard figures on how many people are currently homeless.

The Salvation Army provided these figures based on the 2021 Census:

  • Victoria has the highest rate of people seeking assistance due to homelessness (37%)
  • 1 in 64 people in Victoria are seeking assistance
  • In New South Wales, 1 in 118 are seeking assistance.

This is only a small snapshot and is lacking context. It obviously doesn’t count people who don’t access assistance.

What is classed as ‘homeless’?

Homelessness is more than sleeping on the street. According to the Salvation Army, homelessness includes:

  • Inadequate housing
  • Have no property, either own or rented
  • Doesn’t have a place where inhabitants have freedom to interact with friends and family.

Causes

The causes of homelessness include:

  • Poverty and having a low income: this probably includes some of tge ‘middle – class too.
  • Mental illness: According to the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI), the Journeys Home Survey revealed that 78% of people who were in “chronic instability” homelessness were diagnosed with mental illnesses. 61% were staying with friends or family.

Additionally, last year, the Sydney Morning Herald revealed that people increasingly had to choose between paying rent and therapy.

  • Being subjected to justice system: serving prison time and homelessness is linked. According to CEO of Jesuit Social Services, Julie Edwards, a third of prisoners in Victoria are homeless, almost immediately
  • Discrimination and being in a marginalised group: The Salvation Army claims that a high proportion of homeless people are: people from a non – English speaking background, women over fifty – five, LGBTQ+ people and people with disabilities

What is the solution?

It’s clear that homelessness is a serious problem. What is the solution?

According to the ABC, stigma towards the homeless is a problem. Stugma causes worse mental and physical health. Poor mental health and homelessness can be a vicious cycle.

An obvious solution pointed out by ABC is increased affordable and social housing.

People who face homelessness also need empathy and compassion. Lizzy, a woman who experienced homelessness, told the ABC:

[Compassion is] one of the most important things. To listen to someone, to not judge them, and just show them respect – that’s often all someone’s looking for

Homelessness is a big issue. It takes governments and individuals having the will to help people out. And it all starts with destigmatising the marginalised. Mental illness services need to be fixed. And, of course, there needs to be more affordable housing.

Categories
various social issues

ADHD: what are effective treatments?

Image: timnewman, iStock

Just a quick note: I’m not a mental health professional. All information is from other sites and articles. If you have any corrections or further information for me, leave me a comment or message via the contact form.

I’ve published some blog posts on ADHD (here, here and here) over the years. Last year, I received a link to a research paper on ADHD treatment. I’m finally ready to write about it. Sorry it took so long.

Thank you, Ellla for sending me the link.

What’s the best treatment for ADHD?

The paper I’m working off is Drugwatch. The paper is written by Michelle Llamas (Board Certified Patient Advocate).

In describing ADHD treatments, Llamas wrote:

Medical providers prescribe a combination of ADHD treatments — including education and training programs, medications and behaviour therapy.

Treatments vary according to age:

For most people with ADHD, medication is considered the first line of treatment. However, for children younger than six years of age, experts recommend behaviour management before starting medication.

The treatments for young children has been hotly debated, at least in Australia. In 2022, the Australian ADHD Professional Association came under fire for suggesting medication be the first line of treatment for children under six. As far as I know, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) rejected the recommendation

Best medications to treat ADHD

According to Drugwatch, ADHD is most commonly treated with stimulants, nonstimulants and antidepressants.

Stimulants

The most trusted medications are methylphenidate medications; Ritalin and Adderrall. Both of these medications reportedly help with relationships and completingg tasks. Despite its reported effectiveness, Drugs.com cautions that there’s a small chance of addiction and fatal overdose.

Other potential side effects of stimulants can include: stroke, heart attack and dangerously high blood pressure, heart disease and heart defect.

Nonstimulants

Llama claimed that nonstimulants usually aren’t as effective as stimulants for treating ADHD.

However, according to PsychCentral, around 30% of people with ADHD don’t respond well to stimulant medications.

Sometimes, medical professionals may prescribe both types of medication to patients.

Nonstimulants often take longer to decrease ADHD symptoms, compared to stimulants. According to healthychildren.org, nonstimulants can treat children with ADHD and comorbid Tourette Syndrome.

Behavioural therapy for ADHD

Cropped woman in psychologist while psychologist fills out form
Image: PeopleImages, iStock

Behavioural therapy can help people with ADHD. This may occur in replacement of medication.

The therapy focuses on developing positive behaviours to replace negative ones. A person with ADHD may develop organisation skills, focus and impulse control.

A mode of therapy that can help those with ADHD is Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). CBT helps address negative behaviours that can inhibit focus, productivity and motivation.

Other common therapies for ADHD

People with ADHD may seek out other therapies. These include: family and marital therapy, psychotherapy and social skills training.

Education and training for people with ADHD, parents and caregivers

Parents and caregivers of children with ADHD can seek out parent behaviour training therapies. In these programs, parents and cargivers are given strategies and skills to help their child/ren better cope with their symptoms at school and home.

Adolescents and adults with ADHD can also attend training to manage their symptoms. They can do brain training through mobile/ cell phone games. Mentally stimulating activities, such as crosswords can also be beneficial.

In all the blog posts I’ve written, it’s clear to me that society has a long way to go in understanding ADHD. However, while writing this post, I’ve realised there is a way.

Sounds like medication and (free or at least affordable) therapy for these 8ndividuals is a way to go.

What are your thoughts on ADHD and how it’s currently treated? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

Categories
Relationships/Friendship

Gaslighting: what is, what it isn’t and why it matters

Image: Daniele Mezzadri, iStock

CW: this post discusses abuse and may be upsetting for some readers.

Most people have heard of — and possibly accused someone of — gaslighting.

Merriam – Webster labelled gaslighting the ‘word of the year’ last year.

Earlier this year, actor Jonah Hill was accused of gaslighting after his ex – partner, Sarah Brady leaked his texts. The texts that were made public demanded that Brady delete photos of her in her bikini from Instagram.

Other ‘boundaries‘ Hill alkegedly included: not surfing with men, no modelling and not befriending women who were in “unstable places”. Apparently “getting a lunch or coffee” was OK, though.

In an Instagram caption to a screenshot showing the texts, Brady wrote:

This is a warning to all girls. If your partner is talking to you like this, make an exit plan, call me if you need an ear.

Brady said that she felt gaslit. Was she?

What is gaslighting?

What exactly is gaslighting?

Medical News Today defined gaslighting as:

…a form of psychological abuse where a person causes someone to question their sanity, memories or perception of reality

‘What is gaslighting?’, Jennifer Hulzen, updated 30 No ember 2023

The term originated from the 1944 film, Gaslight. In the film, Paula marries pianist, Gregory Anton (Charles Boyer) years after the murder of her aunt. Anton is the murderer. When Paula and Gregory move to the aunt’s house, strange events start happening. These events — orchestrated by Gregory — made Paula feel like she’s losing her mind.

According to Very Well Mind, gaslighting usually happens in abusive relationships.

Possible signs someone is a victim of gaslighting

Gaslighting is often insidious, However, victims may show warning signs. These include:

  • Severe self – doubt; second guessing yourself
  • Feeling ‘crazy’ or ‘wrong’
  • Trusting other’s decisions, but not your own
  • Over apologising and excusing the abuser’s bad behaviour
  • Feelimg depressed, lonely and confused
  • Deep down, something doesn’t feel ‘right’.

What gaslighting isn’t

Gaslighting isn’t a one – off event

Former professor, narriage and family therapist and podcaster, Dr. Kirk Honda describes gaslight8ng as a ‘campaign. It’s not a one – off event.

Victims of gaslighting often don’t know they’ve gaslit

Secondly, gaslighting isn’t obvious. In previous content, Dr. Honda has said that victims of gaslighting don’t know they’ve been gaslit until after the end of an abusive relationship; often in therapy.

Gaslighting isn’t simply lying

As you can probably guess by now, gaslighting isn’t simply lying. It’s often an insidious campaign in which an abuser chips away at the victim’s sense of teality and their instincts.

Why does this matter?

Does it matter how the word gaslighting is used?

I think so. Survivors of abuse need a voice. They need language to express what they’ve gone through. They don’t need people diminishing their traumas by misusing the term.

However, last year, even Dr Honda conceded that words’ meanings do change over time. Still, I think we still need to be careful to not minimise someone’s trauma.

Lastly, I just want to add that, I have no idea what happened between Jonah Hill and Sarah Brady. I don’t know whether or not gaslighting occurred in their relationship. I just wanted to talk about what gaslighting is and isn’t. At least in the traditional sense.

If you are in Australia and am experiencing domest8c abuse, contact 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732). If you are in danger, call 000 or your national emergency number.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary

Is immigration to blame for rent rises?

Red and white ‘For Rent’ sign in front of white house
Image: feverpitched, iStock

In Australia and other parts of the world, the cost of living is hitting most people hard.

Since the pandemic, the cost of food, fuel/ gas, rent and housing have kept skyrocketing.

I’ve written about this a few times. Last year, I wrote that many people planned on skipping Christmas presents to limit costs.

This year, things haven’t been any better. In February, interest rates had risen nine times since Labor came to power.

Renters are also hurting

Throughout this year, renters have found it harder to gain long – term and affordable accommodation.

According to the ABC, renters risk having insecure housing. Many tenants, who are forced to pay more rent, are also waiting for repairs.

Is immigration responsible for the rental crisis?

People making the shape of Australia
Image: Boarding1Now, iStock

Is immigration responsible for the rental property shortage and inflation? Or are they just scapegoats?

According to the ABC, former Liberal Treasurer, Peter Costello claimed that immigration is great for Australia. However, i5 was putting pressure on the property and rental market.

Australia’s inflation has been rising rapidly since September. In that time, rents have gone up by by 2.2 per cent.Property prices have risen 1.3 per cent.

Rents have risen by 7.6 per cent; the highest rise since 2009. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) have claimed that rent prices would be worse without the government’s Commonwealth Rent Assistance.

Economist, Chris Richardson told the ABC that immigration wa# only “part of the inflation story”.

Richardson praised immigration for filling skill shortsges. However, he admitted that immigration played a part in exacerbating the rent crisis.

Reserve Bank Australia Michele Bullock said in a speech made similar claims:

Immigration, I think in general, is a good thing for Australia. It’s always been a good thing. Obviously, there’s contention for housing and things that the government has got to think about, but the concept of immigration in and of itself, I think, ultimately is a good thing — if it’s run well.

What are renters’ rights?

I think it’s important to point out legal rights renters have. Unfortnately, the Renters and Housing Union spokesperson, Monty Hill claimed:

A lot of people don’t know the rules… or understand the grey areas. They’re [the tenants are] not understanding that they can challenge these things and there is a process for that, outside of talking to the property manager or landlord.

Rights for renters and landlords vary from state to state, the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory (of course they do!)

New South Wales

  • Landlords can only increase rents once every twelve months
  • Landlords must give written notice to tenants at least sixty days before a rent increase.
  • Rents can’t be increased if a lease is fixed for only two years
  • Landlords must not give vague reasons for the increase; i.e, ‘in line with the market’
  • Tenants have a right to challenge rent increases within thirty days of getting the notice.

Victoria

  • Similar to New South Wales, landlords can increase rents every twelve months on periodic rental agreements from mid – 2019 or later. On older agreements, landlords can raise rents every six months
  • There’s no caps on how much rents can increase
  • Landlords must give tenants a minimum sixty days notice before rents can increase
  • Rental properties must meet minimum structural standards. These include:
    • Must have functioning deadlatches, with functioning locks. Outside must be able to be locked and unlocked with a key, and the inside be able to be locked/ unlocked without
    • Must have functional toilets, and bathrooms with adequate hot and cold water
    • Kitchens must have a dedicated food preparation/ cooking area. It must include a working stove top with at least two functioning hotplates
    • Windows need blinds or coverings in bedrooms and living areas. Tenants needto be able to lock windows
    • Working heater in main living area
    • Enough ventilation and adequate lighting
    • Update electric switcheboards with safety switches and circuit breakers
  • Landlords must fix any broken windows or mould immediately. Tenants are responsible for making sure bathroom is properly ventilated
  • When renters want to end a tenancy, they usually have to give the landlord twenty – eight days notice. In some cases, tenants can give a two weeks’ notice.
  • If a landlord wants to end a tenancy, they must give ninety days notice. The landlord has to provide an adequate reason and evidence to evict a tenant

Queensland

  • Landlords can increase rents every six months, provided they give tenants two month# written notice. However, in March this year, the Annastacia Palaszczuk’s government was planning to only allow the landlords to raise rents once a year. (I’m not sure whethe4 or not it changed).
  • Rents can’t increase during a fixed term unless it’s stated in the agreement.
  • Tenants can challenge rent increases by going to Queensland’s Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
  • Since September, Queensland rentals have been mandated to be “safe, secure and functional”.
  • Other mandates include, but not limited to:
    • Homes must be weatherproof and structurally sound
    • Properties must have doorswith external locks and curtains must be on bedroom windows
    • There must be functioning drainage and plumbing
    • Must have functioning bathrooms and kitchens.
  • Landlord is responsible for ensuring that is their property is fit to live in. They are responsible for mould and other repairs. However, tenants and their associates are responsible for any damage they cause.

Australian Capital Territory (ACT)

  • Landlords can only raise rents once every twelve months
  • Tenants must be given eight weeks’ notice
  • Details of rent increases must be included in fixed -term agreements
  • The rate in which landlords raise rents must be in line with the Consumer Price Index
  • Landlords can only can only raise rents in line with inflation, plus 10%.
  • If a labdlord exceeds the rent increase limit and the tenant refuses the deal, the landlord must apply to the tribunal
  • Landlords must ensure tha5 properties are inhabitable and be in a reasonable state
  • Landlords have nine months to ensure energy efficiency standard for ceiling insulation is met
  • Landlords are responsible for maintaining the property
  • Landlords are responsiblefor urgent repairs if the damage puts tenants in potential risk of harm. This includes mould.
  • Tenants must alert their landlord as soon as possible when repairs are needed
  • Tenants may be responsible for maintaining gardens, smoke alarms and light bulbs.
  • Generally, tenants in a periodic tenancy or who are leaving after a fixed – term lease must give the landlord three weeks notice. This doesn’t always apply.
  • Tenants who break the lease clause may be required to pay six – weeks worth of rent or pay rent until a new tenant is found. However, limits may apply.
  • Landlords can’t evict a tenant/s without a proper reason

Western Australia

  • Landlords can only increase rents for fixed – term tenants outlined in the tenancy agreement, with details on how they’re calculated.
  • Landlords can increase rents after giving tenants sixty days notice
  • Rents can increase at six month intervals
  • Within 30 days, tenants can approach the Magistrates Court to dispute rent increases
  • All rental properties must be in reasonable condition
  • Rentals need to have adequate safety and security: secure locks on doors and windows, outside lights, window fittings and working smoke alarms
  • Landlords are responsible for urgent maintenance. They must comply with building and health and safety regulations
  • Landlords are responsible for mould and mildew caused by faulty gutters, lack of ventilation or other faulty fixtures
  • Tenants are held responsible for any damage they cause. They must arrange (and pay for) those repairs
  • For tenants with fixed – term leases, landlords must give tenants thirty – days’ notice if they don’r ppt want to renew the lease
  • For those in peroidic tenancies, landlords must give tenants thirty days’ notice if they’re selling the property. If they are ending the tenancy without valid reason, landlords must give tenants sixty days’ notice
  • If a tenant wants to end a fixed – term tenancy, they must give the landlord thirty days’ notice. If a tenant wants to end a periodic tenancy, they must give the landlord twenty – one days’ notice.

South Australia

  • Rents can only be increased once a year
  • Tenants must be given sixty days’ notice before rents are raised
  • If the tenant believes that a rent rise is excessive, they can contact the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
  • In a fixed – term agreement, any rent increases must be outlined in the document
  • Landlords must provide a clean and safe home for tenants
  • Repairs that the landlord are responsible for include:
    • Satisfactory kitchen and bathroom
    • Plumbing, gas and electricity
    • Access to natural lighting and ventilation
  • Landlords and tenants are both responsible for maintenance. Landlords are usually responsible for: replacing blown light bulbs, tap filters, garden work like pruning fruit trees. They also responsible for general repairs and must carry such repairs in a timely manner. Landlords must also keep homes free of mould.
  • Tenants are responsible for: cleaning air conditioner filters and general garden maintenance
  • To end a fixed – term lease, the landlord or tenant need to give the other party twenty – eight day notice. If no notice is given in the timeframe, the tenancy continues as a periodic lease.
  • When a tenant wants to end a periodic lease, the tenant must give three weeks (21 days) or a month notice if the rent is paid monthly. If a landlord wants to end a tenancy for no reason, they must give the tenant 90 days’ notice (for a periodic lease). If a landlord plans to live in, demolish it, do major renovations or want to sell their property, they need to give tenants sixty days’ notice.

Tasmania

  • Rents can increase once a year
  • Landlords are required to give tenants sixty days noticed before they increase rent
  • Rents can be increased in a fixed term, only if it’s explicitly outlined in the lease
  • If tenants believe a rent increase is excessive, they can apply a review through the Residential Tenancy Commission
  • Rental properties must be waterproof, clean and in good condition
  • Rental properties must have:
    • a functioning toilet
    • kitchens that have a stove top, oven, sink and hot and cold running water
    • Safe and functioning power points. Electrical wires need to be behind walls or in the ceiling
    • Adequate lighting ( natural and/ or artificial)
    • Fixed heater — wood or heat pump — in the main living area
    • Blinds/ curtains
    • Adequate ventilation
  • Landlords are responsible for maintenance. They must ensure the property remains in a satisfactory condition. Tenants must notify the landlord of repairs needed within seven days.
  • Fixed period leases: if landlord wants to end a tenancy, they must give tenants 42 – 60 days notice
  • Non – fixed lease: landlord must give tenant forty – two days’ notice that property will be sold, leased out to another person, renovated, no longer a rental property or a family member is set to move in

Northern Territory

  • Landlords can increase rents once every six months
  • Landlords must give tenants at least thirty days’ written notice before raising rent
  • Landlords can only raise the rent if it’s stated in the lease
  • Tenants can apply to the tribunal if they think the rent rise is excessive
  • Properties must be habitable
  • Landlords must ensure everything is in reasonable state of repair
  • Landlords must adhere to health and safety regulations
  • Landlords must ensure that properties have secure locks and other security measures
  • Landlords must ensure rental properties are livable, allowing wear and tear
  • Landlords are responsible for:
    • Burst pipes
    • Blocked toilets
    • Breakdown of services that are essential
  • To end a fixed – term lease, landlords and tenants must give the other party at least two weeks (14 days) notice
  • For periodic leases, tenants must give at least two weeks (14 days) notice
  • However, if a landlord wants to end a periodic lease, they must give tenants six weeks (42 days) notice

Who do these State/ Territory regulations benefit?

At the bottom of the article, commenters alleged that when they complained to their State’s/ Territory’s legal body, they were evicted. Other conmenters lamented that the laws favour the tenants

While working on this post, here is the conclusion I’ve come up with. Australia has been behind in housing development. Australia isn’t ready for mass migration. That is not the fault of those who choose to live here. It’s the fault of governments.

Laws surrounding rental properties need to change. I believe they must be clear, fair to landlords and tenants and nationwide.

What do you think is contributing to Australia’s rental crisis? What do you think can fix it? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary

ADHD diagnoses are rising. Should people with the condition join the NDIS?

Image: Ildar Abulkhanov, iStock

Should treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) be covered under the National Disability Insurance Scheme?

According to Sydney Morning Herald, mental health professionals are pressuring Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese to include ADHD on the NDIS.

In July, psychologists and psychiatrists attended a Senate Committee arguing for more people with ADHD be included on the NDIS. Currently, over 800,000 children have an ADHD diagnosis. Only 5,000 currently access the NDIS.

According to SMH’s Natassia Chrysanthos, in the past five years, the number of Australians being medicated for ADHD has more than doubled. Figures show that more than 400,000 people take medication for the neurodevelopmental disorder. Awareness and education have been attributed to the spike.

That’s a huge spike!

What the Senate Inquiry recommended

Corner of Australian green Medicare card showing Medicare logo. Calculator and Australian money notes in the background.
Image: robymac, iStock

So, why are psychologists and psychiatrists pushing for more children with ADHD be put on the NDIS?

Because Medicare has proven to be grossly inadequate. Waiting lists are too long and too many parents can’t afford to get their children assessed or treated.

The Senate Inquiry recommended changes the Medicare and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).

The findings recommended a nationwide approach to treatment and research:

It is clear that a more consistent and coordinated approach is needed across government systems to ensure these systems are accessible to people with ADHD.

Other submissions pointed out the need for access to Occupational Therapists (OTs), psychologists and speech therapists.

Adult ADHD and potential risks

ADHD is often looked down upon. Some people say that it ‘wasn’t a thing’ ten years ago.

Often, ADHD is stereotyped as children (particularly boys), misbehaving. However, there is a lot more to ADHD. And it can have devastating consequences if not managed properly.

Potential risks for adults with unmanaged ADHD can include:

1. Car accidents and dangerous behaviour: According to Very Well Mind, adults with ADHD can be easily distracted while driving. People with ADHD are also more prone to risk – taking behaviour, such as speeding.

2. Anxiety: According to Very Well Health, people with ADHD often suffer from anxiety. The comorbidity rate is around 50%.

3. Substance use disorder: Many studies show that adults with ADHD are likely to be addicted to nicotine. They are 50% more likely than the general population to have a drug or alcohol use disorder.

4. Difficulties in the workplace: Adults face many issues in the workplace, especially around staying on task and communicating.

5. Difficulty in self – esteem, emotional regulations and relationships: People with ADHD often struggle with self – esteem, emotional regulation and relationships.

In romantic relationships, people with ADHD may be able to ‘mask’ their symptoms initially. However, the longer a relationship goes on, hyper focusing on a partner may turn to ignoring.

Due to low self – esteem, people with ADHD may constantly seek out reassurance from their partner/s. They may constantly question their partner/s’ love and commitment. This can put a strain on the relationship, as trust slowly erodes away.

What is the answer?

I have sympathy for people with conditions like ADHD. I’m all for early diagnosis and intervention. People with ADHD deserve to get the support they need.

However, I’m not sure that increasing the number of participants on the NDIS is the answer. Many people with neurodivergence and/ or mental illnesses have been let down badly by the National Disability Insurance Agency already.

I think fixing Medicare, making psychology free and accessible is a potential answer. Trying to fit more and more people on the NDIS will only end badly.

What do you think? Should people with ADHD have access to the NDIS? Or is there another solution? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary

ABC calls out abuse against Patricia Karvelas

Trigger warning: this post discusses cyber – bullying. If this is triggering for you, please take care. Feel free to skip this post.

Earlier this month, ABC’s News Director, Justin Stevens condemned trolls for abusing Radio National’s Patricia Karvelas. The abuse Karvelas experienced was largely sexualised, racist and homophobic.

It is disturbing, saddening and angering that Patricia should find herself the target of online trolling and abuse, much of it sexualised, homophobic and racist…

Effects of cyber – bullying

I can’t say I’m a massive Karvelas fan. Honestly, I don’t listen to Radio National. However, I’m vehemently against bullying, including cyber – bullying.

Everyone should know the potentially devastating effects of online bullying. These can include:

  • Guilt and feeling like the abuse is your fault
  • Hopelessness
  • Sadness and anxiousness
  • Feeling unsafe and
  • Shame, humiliation and embarrassment

What makes cyber- bullying worse than other forms of bullying is that it can be pervasive. It follows the victim home, any time day or night.

Homophobia

Image: Wirestock, iStock

I can’t believe homophobia is still an issue in Australia.

Karvelas has been a journalist since 2003. She started as a cadet reporter in Canberra.

Until recently, Karvelas was in the closet about her sexual orientation and the gender of her partner. She was particularly wary of anti – LGBTQ+ politicians. I don’t blame her for not wanting to be open about her sexuality back then.

Twenty years later, we’ve progressed. Same – sex marriage has been legal in Australia since 2017. Attempts to water down anti – discrimination protections have (so far) been shot down.

Yet, homophobia is obviously still an issue.

In my opinion, bullying based on sexual orientation is one of the worst forms of emotional bullying.

It’s an attack on a person’s core. The threat of being discriminated against or attacked based on sexual orientation just leaves people closeted. The ability to trust disappears and it can take a long time to get it back.

Karvelas has already battled that fear. She shouldn’t have to keep fighting it in 2023.

Racism

Image: Shutter2U, iStock

Karvelas has also allegedly faced racist abuse. For those who don’t know, Karvelas is of Greek descent.

Surely, we all know how terrible and how wrong racism is. Haven’t people learned from the aftermath of the Adam Goodes’ saga in 2015? I know people have different views on Goodes. However, I think clear that racist bullying played a part in ending his AFL career. AFL’s Executive Officer, Gillon McLachlan expressed regret on the AFL’s inaction against the abuse.

In the years since, racism has been in Australia’s consciousness. When AFL spectators abused former Adelaide Crows star, Eddie Betts in 2020, it was condemned immediately. That’s how it should be.

I can’t say it enough. No one deserves to be bullied. Everyone deserves to be safe at home, work and online.

If this post has brought up any issues for you and you’re in Australia, you can contact:

Lifeline: 13 11 14

Beyond Blue: 1300 224 636

If you are in immediate danger, call 000 (or your national emergency number).