Categories
Opinion/Commentary

Grace Tame controversy and (another) never – ending Australia Day debate

Image: spukkato, iStock

Another Australia Day has passed. For those who don’t know, Australia Day was on Sunday 26 January (AEST).

On New Year’s Day, I wrote this tweet:

Same old, same old.

And this year, Australia Day didn’t disappoint. People were outraged when 2021’s Australian of the Year, Grace Tame met Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese wearing a ‘F*** Murdoch’ t-shirt. That’s a reference to the CEO of Newscorp and Fox News, Rupert Murdoch.

Tame defended her clothing choice, saying she wore the shirt to “speak truth to power”.

She told the ABC:

One thing that I think unites us is that we want to make progress and a huge roadblock to making progress is the fact… the world for far too long, has been ruled by disproportunately, morbidly wealthy, corporate oligarchs

(‘Grace Tame, former Australian of the Year, meets Anthony Albanese in anti – Murdoch shirt’, ABC, Evelyn Manfield/ Monte Bovill, 25 January 2025)

Grace Tame is a sex abuse survivor and advocate. In 2022, she slammed then – Prime Minister, Scott Morrison for his and the LIberal National Party’s response to sexual assault allegations and a toxic workplace.

After an outcry from members of the public, Albanese addressed the incident:

People were just there , one by one, rolling through, being welcomed. And [Tame’s shirt], was clearly designed to get attention because I do think that it takes away from what the day should be about, which is the amazing people who were nominated as Australians of the Year.

(‘Albanese criticises Grace Tame for her “F— Murdoch” t – shirt”, Michelle Griffin/ Millie Muroi, Sydney Morning Herald, updated 27 January 2025).

Tame hit back at Albanese, arguing that the Murdoch media is more offensive. She made claims that Murdoch media dodges taxes, responsible for destabilising democracies and destroying the earth.

Other controversies

Again, debates raged about whether councils should carry out Citizenship Ceremonies on 26 January. Opposition leader, Peter Dutton swore that he’d force councils to conduct the ceremonies on that day if he won this year’s Federal Election. Dutton. also blasted Albanese for tip – toeing around the issue.

Dutton, himself, went to a citizenship ceremony in Brisbane, Queensland.

Companies, such as Woolworths reversed recent decision not to sell Australia Day merchandise.

This year, grocery monopoly, Woolworths caved to public pressure and began selling Australia Day merchandise again

The Israel- Palestine conflict has become intertwined withvthe debate. Pro – Palestinian protesters view the plight of Palestinians the same as the battle of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander has had against British colonisers.

Opinions of readers of Melbourne’s The Age were mixed:

Think about the worst trauma that your family has suffered, in the near or distant past, then imagine how it would feel if you were expected to celebrate that event on that day every year. When a change of date would make such a difference, why are we being so mean – spirited and thoughless in causing repeated grief to our First Nations people

(Grace Brisbane – Webb, Skye, The Age, 27 January 2025)

Are our state (sic) and federal (sic) Labor governments so tone deaf that they cannot read the room and hear the mood of most Australians? No to the Voice, changing the date of Australia Day, to anti – semitism (sic), to the disruptive behaviour of destructive protesters, and a very big no to the relentless leftist, woke, progressive insanity of Labor’s pursuit of idealism over commonsense. For anyone in doubt, just check the views of the silent majority reflected in recent polls in every state (sic).

(Peter Baulch, Safety Beach, The Age 27 January 2025).

Honestly, I’m getting tired of this endless debate. I hope we can get to a point where we can be united. Where we can celebrate where we are and be excited for the future. Can we reach a resolution by next year?

Categories
Opinion/Commentary

Australian principals are fighting food insecurity among students. How did this get so bad in the first place?

Image: Prostock – Studio, iStock

How can this happen in Australia in 2024?

According to the ABC, 1.3 million Australian children live with food insecurity. Going to school hungry is detrimental to a child’s learning. Fortunately, one school is combatting this.

Alexandra Hills State School, Queensland teamed up with not – for – profit, Eat Up to provide students with a free lunch.

Principal, Scott Ward explained the program as:

[It’s] really a vehicle for the kids to know that we care and that our community cares about them, no matter what, whether they can afford food or they can’t.

(‘Children experiencing food insecurity can face challenges at school. Some groups and principals are changing that’. Stephanie Felsina, ABC News, 9 September 2024)

The school is incredibly humble and wants their students to ask for food without shame:

I think the most important thing for us is we don’t make a big deal of it, because we want our kids to know that they can come to a staff member without shame.

Food insecurity leads to absenteeism

Image: kuarmungadd, iStock

A few months ago, ABC’s Four Corners raised alarm about children being too anxious to go to school.

Living with food insecurity is a common reason for children not attending school.

In 2018, Foodbank revealed that one in three parents lived with food insecurity. When parents struggle with finances, essentials are sacrificed. It’s food vs rent. Or electricity bill vs school expenses.

Heartbreakingly, children who live in poverty face bullying when they do go to school. Parents also told Foodbank they realised mood and behavioural changes in their children due to hunger.

Conversely, founder of Eat Up, Lyndon Galea has seen an increase of attendance since partnering with Alexandra Hill School.

Schools also reached out to other charities, such as Y (formerly YMCA), to help provide food for students. Like Mr. Ward, Y aims to destigmatise children reaching out when in need.

Touching stories exposes national shame

Alexandra High Schol and charities should be commended for providing food to hungry children. However, it exposes a national shame.

The media in Australia is flooded with reports of the cost of living crisis. There have also been reports of major supermarkets, most infamously, Woolworths, being condemned for falsely advertising ‘specials’. Social media users exposed the supermarket giant for price gouging and exploiting the cost of living crisis.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), has launched legal action against Woolworths and Coles, accusing them of raising prices and falsely promoting them as specials.

It’s disgusting how supermarket giants, power companies and, ultimately the Australian Government has created this situation. It’s disgusting that children don’t have the means to have their basic needs met. We’re not talking about a twelve – year – old wanting the latest PlayStation, PARENTS CAN’T AFFORD TO FEED THEIR CHILDREN! It’s such an outrage with plenty of blame to go around.

So, what can be done? Until the Government gets its act together, maybe you can support an Australian charity. The Smith Family directly helps children in poverty attend school.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary

Disney: from magic to heartlessness

Image: FelixCatana, iStock

When I was a child in the 1990’s, I was obsessed with Disney. When I was ablut five or six I wanted Cinderella and Snow White and the Seven Dwarves videos.

In 1995, I remember wanting to go to Disney World or Disneyland so badly. Back then, people who had Pocahontas and Toy Story on video had a chance to win a flight to Disney World in Florida. I didn’t win, much to my disappointment.

I also loved Sleeping Beauty. A few years later, I fell in love with Mulan. You get it. I was a Disney kid through and through until I was in my mid teens.

Now, as an adult, I find the Walt Dosney Company so… heartless. They have sacrificed safety, human dignity and compassion for profit.

The food allergy death and the Disney+ ‘fine print

This is the most recent scandal that I know of.

According to the ABC, last year, Kanokporn Tangsuan allegedly died in a Disney Springs restaurant. It’s alleged that Mrs Tangsuan had an allergic reaction to nuts and dairy in the food. Walt Disney Corporation advertised that accommodating for people with allergies was a “top priority”.

In the aftermath of Dr. Tangsuan’s death, her husband, Jeffrey Piccolo tried to pursue a wrongful death lawsuit against Walt Disney Corporation. Rather than admit guilt, Walt Disney Company callously argued that Dr. Kanokporn’s family couldn’t sue. They made the bogus claim that pursuing a lawsuit went against Disney Plus’s Terms and Conditions.

Lawyers supporting Piccolo said Disney’s ‘fine print’ argument was “absurd”.

Disney’s backpedal and response

After the public found out Disney’s callousness, Disney backpedalled. Kind of. Disney offered a vague, inauthentic response:

With such unique circumstances as ones in this case, we believe this situation warrants a sensitive approach to expedite a resolution for the family who have experienced such a painful loss.

Walt Disney Corporation should give Piccolo and his family a proper apology. Then again, psychopaths can’t give genuine apologies, can they?

Disney goes after grieving father over dead son’s tomb stone

Dr. Tangsuan’s death isn’t the only time where Walt Disney Corporation has been heartless.

In 2019, Disney clashed with British father, Lloyd Jones over a Spider-Spider-Man display on his son, Ollie’s tombstone. Ollie passed away after a battle with leukodystrophy. Jones wanted to use a picture of Spider-Man to honour his son.

Disney Corporation dug their heels in, arguing that Walt Disney himself forbade his cartoons from being engraved on tombstones.

This caused outrage. Over 16,000 people signed a petition calling for Disney Corporation to change their policies. Families of children who’ve passed away should be able to display Disney movies on tombstones.

Jones’ brother, Jason joined in the chorus calling for Disney to change thir mind. Disney didn’t buckle, but offered a ‘one – of – a – kind’ illustration, with words commemorating Ollie.

So, what can we say about Disney? They’re heartless. They don’t care about their fans — children or adults. They only care about money and bogus terms and conditions. Maybe keep that in mind when you’re thinking about signing up to Disney Plus.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary Uncategorized

Women are falling prey to MLMs. What is Multi-Level Marketing?

Image: Andrii Dodonov, iStock

According to the ABC, people in regional Australia, are falling for Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) schemes.

One MLM that’s preying on people in regional Australia is one promoting a Japanese machine that “electrolyses tap water” and promises “triple health” to people who drink it. They gain recruits by promising a six – figure salary.

However, this is often far from reality.

Proponents of MLMs promise a dream. However, most people who enter MLMs realise quickly that it’s a nightmare.

What is Multi-level Marketing

Before we go any further, what is Multi-level Marketing?

Forbes defines multi-level marketing as:

Multi-level Marketing (MLM), also known as direct marketing or network marketing, is a method of selling products directly to consumers using independent sales representatives

(‘Understanding Multi-level Marketing’ E. Napoletano, Editor: Benjamin Curry, Forbes Advisor, Updated 26 April 2023)

Investapedia argues that there are ‘legitimate’ MLM businesses. From what I’ve heard and read over the years, ‘legitimate’ MLMs must be few and far in between.

The Rural Freedom Movement

According to the ABC, Kate* (name has been changed) is a single mother from remote Queensland. She sees a post of a young woman 8n a cowgirl hat. This woman appears to be living in luxury. This mystery woman is Kylie Stevenson.

She claims to make her income online. How? She claims it’s by recruiting people to sell big ticket items.

Stevenson started The Rural Freedom Movement. She advertises it as:

…a community of rural people who are seeking to learn how to create an online income and build a legacy for their future.

In a social media post, Stevenson wrote:

If you’re looking for an opportunity to break free from a 9-5 grind and create a life of financial freedom, then you’re in the right place.

(‘4 reasons not to turn to an MLM for an income boost’, Kelly Scott, 5 February 2021)

Does it all sound too good to. be true? Well, The Rural Freedom is an MLM. So, it’s more likely than not that many people who join The Rural Freedom Movement will not get what they were promised.

Most people lose, not make money in MLMs. And they lose relationships

Image: Gearstd, iStock

There’s a reason why MLMs are frequently compared to pyramid schemes.

You are far, far more likely to lose money in an MLM. According to the ABC, less than one per cent make lots of money through MLMs. In fact, many can’t make a living from them at all.

When people join an MLM, they are pressured to buy their MLM products using their own money. This is often expensive and it’s impossible for most people to break even, let alone make a profit.

Lucy* (not real name), a young stay – at – home mother, claims that MLM recruiters harass and are “relentless”. And they’re unaffordable.

To hide this reality, recruiters use love – bombing to add to their downline.

I have a very, very strict budget and I can’t buy this crap all the time. I hate MLMs so much. The guilting, the relentless posting… and the girls from school in my DMs like, ‘Hey babe, how are you?’ I don’t respond anymore because I already know what they want.

(‘4 reasons ot to turn to an MLM for an income boost’, Kelly Scott, 5 February 2021).

Like cults, some MLMs encourage their recruiters to cut ties to friends and family who are concerned.

This makes people who join MLMs feel isolated. This makes MLM companies to rely solely on other members of the MLM.

Almost all MLMs leave people broke and broken-hearted. They are predatory. They promote a false reality and shame those who don’t live up to the image they promote. I think they should be avoided like the plague.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary

Did the ABC drag LGBTQ+ people through the mud for clickbait?

Image: Kokkal Ng, iStock

The ABC reported allegations that Year Nine girls at Renmark High School were exposed to references of ‘bestiality’ during a ‘Respectful Relationships’ class.

Female students claimed they were told to leave their current classes to attend a presentation. There was staff from Headspace, Berri.

One student, Courtney White, 14 said:

We had a teacher that told us to grab a chair and sit in front of the board, and then the Headspace people came in and then the Headspace people came in and then [the teacher] left, so, we’re sitting in front of a board alone with no teachers, just Headspace people.

Quick note: She’s only fourteen (apparently). The above quote (which is word for word from the ABC article) is weird. It sounds like the teacher abandoned them.

When I was in high school, teachers were always present at speeches, presentations, etc. So, why did the teachers in Renmark High leave them now?

Mentions of bestiality: what is the truth?

The biggest controversy was an alleged reference to bestiality. The way some commented on it, it sounds like zoophiles are included in the LGBTQ+ community.

Were LGBTQ+ people linked to zoophiles? What was the real context? According to a Reddit post:

Apparently, (according to the other sub), what happened was the presenter made a reference that years ago, LGBT people were compared to those who’d practice bestiality, (well, not that long ago as it was said during the marriage equality debate). Some of the young students in the audience misunderstood what that meant and by the time it got back to their parents, it had become a lecture on bestiality.

NoteChoice7719, 5 April 2024

Other Reddit users were confused what happened. Some even doubted the students’ accounts.

If NoteChoice7719 is correct, the presenter wasn’t completely wrong. During the same – sex marriage debate in 2016 – 2017, people argued that same – sex marriage would lead to acceptance of bestiality. That was so disgusting. Frankly, it didn’t need to be repeated.

When news got out, parents were outraged. According to The Mercury, at least one mother removed her three children from the school.

Renmark High School receives backlash and apologises

The backlash against was Renmark High School was swift. So was their response.

RHS Principal, Mat Evans admitted that the school was in the wrong. He assured parents that it was being investigated. In the meantime, the presenter has been suspended from all government schools.

He admitted students were uncomfortable during the presentation. He also expressed regret about not informing parents and that school staff weren’t present.

So, was the ABC wrong?

When I first researched for this story, I was so disappointed in the ABC. I thought they were throwing LGBTQ+ under the bus. However, I don’t think that now.

There seems to be confusion on exactly what was said at the presentation. However, it sounds like both Renmark High School and Headspace Berri was in the wrong. They shouldn’t have make the students uncomfortable. The Principal and parents should’ve been informed

To be fair, I’m willing to believe that the presenter didn’t mean to link the LGBTQ+ community to bestiality or other illegal activities. The ABC probably should have made that clearer.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary Uncategorized

Does Finland hold the answers for Australia’s early childhood education and care crisis?

Getty Images: iStock

Australia has an early childhood education and care crisis. Actually, there’s a number of crises.

Most parents and caregivers can’t afford not to work. Ironically, early childhood education can be so expensive, it makes working seem pointless.

There’s more.

Many Australian parents are finding it almost impossible to find spots for their children without waiting for a significant period of time.

Emma Douglas from Broome, Western Australia, told ABC’s 7.30:

[I’d] be posting on the Broome babysitting Facebook pages begging, begging, for a babysitter that could fit in with the days that I needed.

Douglas eventually gave up her job due to lack of available childcare. Fortunately after being in Broome for two years, Douglas was able to find a childcare place.

She said the childcare system: “doesn’t feel fair”.

Finland’s childcare system

Image: digograndi, iStock

Unlike Australia’s private childcare system, Finland’s childcare centres are run by local government. It’s also considered a right.

Professor of education at the University of Jyaskyla, Heidi Harji – Luukkainen explained:

So, in Finland, we have a subjective right for children to get early childhood education, which means that the parents are guaranteed placement for the child in early childhood education whenever there is a need.

Additionally, childcare fees aren’t blanket amounts. They’re dependent on a family’s income. Fees can range from A$50 to A$500 a month. In Australia, the system is a bit more complex.

Austalian governments have introduced childcare subsidies. In mid – to – late 2020, the Liberal National Party (LNP), ended JobKeeper for early childhood educators and rolled back free childcare for working families.

Lack of access

Another issue that Australian parents face is finding an early childhood education centre nearby.

Many parents, especially in Australia’s capital cities have to travel almost half an hour to take their child/ren to childcare. This creates stress on both the parents and children. They often have to leave home early in the morning and get home in the evening. Talk about a busy day!

In contrast, Finland has numerous early childhood education centres that are near enough for families.

The history of Finland’s early childhood education system

According to Jacobin, Finland’s successful early childhood education system didn’t happen overnight.

The first kindergarten was established in the capital, Helsinki in 1888. This was established for working -class families. Four years later, education for early childhood teachers began. Since 1995, most Finnish early childhood educators hold a degree. In Australia, the minimum qualification to work in early childhood education is Certificate III.

In 1919, Finnish municipalities were granted the right to establish early childhood education centres. Only a few took the offer. However, after World War Two, early childhood education was formalised.

In 1973, Finland’s government introduced the Child Daycare Act. This made childcare a right for Finnish children. This came about because childcare was only accessible to families who could afford or access it geographically (sound familiar?)

So, yes, Australia can learn from Finland. It’s all about priorities. Early childhood education needs to be considered a right to all children, not just a privilege for some.

What do you think? Should Australia try to adopt Finland’s esrly childhood education system? Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary

Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt sentenced for child abuse

Trigger warning: this post mentions child abuse and may be triggering for some readers. If this is true for you, please proceed with care.

On Wednesday, (Australian Eastern Daylight Time), a Utah judge sentenced Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrandt

The 8 Passengers’ matriarch was sentenced between four to sixty years imprisonment for aggravated child abuse. Hildebrandt was given the same sentence.

Late last year, Franke confessed to abusing her – then twelve -year – old son. She admitted to forcing him to work outside in late Spring to late Summer (May to August). Despite the heat, Franke’s son wasn’t given adequate water. He also suffered severe sunburns.

Franke also physically abused her son and bound his ankles and wrists with handcuffs and rope.

Franke then ‘treated’ the boy’s injuries with duct tape.

When the judge asked her plea, Franke said:

With my deepest regret and sorrow for my family and my children, guilty.

Franke treated her then – then nine – year. – old – daughter in similar ways.

Yet, Franke has had the gall to accuse one of her children of sexual abuse and calling her children ‘evil and posessed’. If the second statement isn’t an example of projection, I don’t know what is!

Franke’s sadistic nature was evident on ‘8 Passengers’

Image: contrastaddict, iStock

No one should be surprised with these charges. Ruby is sadistic and she hasn’t hid it.

As far back as 2020, viewers were disturbed over Franke’s overly – strictt parenting.

She treated her children horribly, all in the public eye.

Last year, reporters and commentators revealed that Franke forced her eldest son to sleep on a beanbag for seven months. In a video, the teenager revealed that he’d got in trouble for pranking his brother.

She refused to give her young daughter —who was six at the time — lunch at school. Why? Because the six – year – old daughter forgot to pack it.

In 2021, Franke announced that she and Kevin were giving two of their youngest children “the gift of truth” for Christmas. That’s code for nothing. These children weren’t even teenagers at this stage.

But wait, there’s more. Both children were used by toy companies to promote… toys for Christmas. You can’t make this stuff up!

Snail Galaxy started a petition calling for Child Protection Services (CPS) to investigate Franke’s treatment of the children. Unfortunately, it amassed less than three hundred signatures. But Franke was starting to get attention for all the wrong reasons.

YouTuber Josh Barbour has covered Franke’s cruelty on Dad Challenge Podcast for about three years.

Ex – LDS couple, Jordan and McKay has also spoken about Franke and Hildebrandt, especially Hildebrandt’s therapy practices.

Where to from here?

The imprisonment of Franke and Hildebrandt brings up many issues. One is exploitation of children online. The other is the danger of the ‘picture perfect’ image that family vloggers put across. It seems limke that the more ‘perfect’ a vlogger family seems, the more that they have to hide.

As social media users, the best we can do is stop falling for it. Stop watching family vlogs and other problematic creators. Fortunately, that’s starting to happen.

If this post brings up any issues for you and you’re in Australia, you can contact:

Lifeline: 13 11 14

Beyond Blue: 1300 224 636 or go on their webchat

Kids Helpline (for those between five and 25): 1800 55 1800 or their webchat

If you or anyone you know is in immediate danger, call 000 or your national emergency number.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary

Is immigration to blame for rent rises?

Red and white ‘For Rent’ sign in front of white house
Image: feverpitched, iStock

In Australia and other parts of the world, the cost of living is hitting most people hard.

Since the pandemic, the cost of food, fuel/ gas, rent and housing have kept skyrocketing.

I’ve written about this a few times. Last year, I wrote that many people planned on skipping Christmas presents to limit costs.

This year, things haven’t been any better. In February, interest rates had risen nine times since Labor came to power.

Renters are also hurting

Throughout this year, renters have found it harder to gain long – term and affordable accommodation.

According to the ABC, renters risk having insecure housing. Many tenants, who are forced to pay more rent, are also waiting for repairs.

Is immigration responsible for the rental crisis?

People making the shape of Australia
Image: Boarding1Now, iStock

Is immigration responsible for the rental property shortage and inflation? Or are they just scapegoats?

According to the ABC, former Liberal Treasurer, Peter Costello claimed that immigration is great for Australia. However, i5 was putting pressure on the property and rental market.

Australia’s inflation has been rising rapidly since September. In that time, rents have gone up by by 2.2 per cent.Property prices have risen 1.3 per cent.

Rents have risen by 7.6 per cent; the highest rise since 2009. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) have claimed that rent prices would be worse without the government’s Commonwealth Rent Assistance.

Economist, Chris Richardson told the ABC that immigration wa# only “part of the inflation story”.

Richardson praised immigration for filling skill shortsges. However, he admitted that immigration played a part in exacerbating the rent crisis.

Reserve Bank Australia Michele Bullock said in a speech made similar claims:

Immigration, I think in general, is a good thing for Australia. It’s always been a good thing. Obviously, there’s contention for housing and things that the government has got to think about, but the concept of immigration in and of itself, I think, ultimately is a good thing — if it’s run well.

What are renters’ rights?

I think it’s important to point out legal rights renters have. Unfortnately, the Renters and Housing Union spokesperson, Monty Hill claimed:

A lot of people don’t know the rules… or understand the grey areas. They’re [the tenants are] not understanding that they can challenge these things and there is a process for that, outside of talking to the property manager or landlord.

Rights for renters and landlords vary from state to state, the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory (of course they do!)

New South Wales

  • Landlords can only increase rents once every twelve months
  • Landlords must give written notice to tenants at least sixty days before a rent increase.
  • Rents can’t be increased if a lease is fixed for only two years
  • Landlords must not give vague reasons for the increase; i.e, ‘in line with the market’
  • Tenants have a right to challenge rent increases within thirty days of getting the notice.

Victoria

  • Similar to New South Wales, landlords can increase rents every twelve months on periodic rental agreements from mid – 2019 or later. On older agreements, landlords can raise rents every six months
  • There’s no caps on how much rents can increase
  • Landlords must give tenants a minimum sixty days notice before rents can increase
  • Rental properties must meet minimum structural standards. These include:
    • Must have functioning deadlatches, with functioning locks. Outside must be able to be locked and unlocked with a key, and the inside be able to be locked/ unlocked without
    • Must have functional toilets, and bathrooms with adequate hot and cold water
    • Kitchens must have a dedicated food preparation/ cooking area. It must include a working stove top with at least two functioning hotplates
    • Windows need blinds or coverings in bedrooms and living areas. Tenants needto be able to lock windows
    • Working heater in main living area
    • Enough ventilation and adequate lighting
    • Update electric switcheboards with safety switches and circuit breakers
  • Landlords must fix any broken windows or mould immediately. Tenants are responsible for making sure bathroom is properly ventilated
  • When renters want to end a tenancy, they usually have to give the landlord twenty – eight days notice. In some cases, tenants can give a two weeks’ notice.
  • If a landlord wants to end a tenancy, they must give ninety days notice. The landlord has to provide an adequate reason and evidence to evict a tenant

Queensland

  • Landlords can increase rents every six months, provided they give tenants two month# written notice. However, in March this year, the Annastacia Palaszczuk’s government was planning to only allow the landlords to raise rents once a year. (I’m not sure whethe4 or not it changed).
  • Rents can’t increase during a fixed term unless it’s stated in the agreement.
  • Tenants can challenge rent increases by going to Queensland’s Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
  • Since September, Queensland rentals have been mandated to be “safe, secure and functional”.
  • Other mandates include, but not limited to:
    • Homes must be weatherproof and structurally sound
    • Properties must have doorswith external locks and curtains must be on bedroom windows
    • There must be functioning drainage and plumbing
    • Must have functioning bathrooms and kitchens.
  • Landlord is responsible for ensuring that is their property is fit to live in. They are responsible for mould and other repairs. However, tenants and their associates are responsible for any damage they cause.

Australian Capital Territory (ACT)

  • Landlords can only raise rents once every twelve months
  • Tenants must be given eight weeks’ notice
  • Details of rent increases must be included in fixed -term agreements
  • The rate in which landlords raise rents must be in line with the Consumer Price Index
  • Landlords can only can only raise rents in line with inflation, plus 10%.
  • If a labdlord exceeds the rent increase limit and the tenant refuses the deal, the landlord must apply to the tribunal
  • Landlords must ensure tha5 properties are inhabitable and be in a reasonable state
  • Landlords have nine months to ensure energy efficiency standard for ceiling insulation is met
  • Landlords are responsible for maintaining the property
  • Landlords are responsiblefor urgent repairs if the damage puts tenants in potential risk of harm. This includes mould.
  • Tenants must alert their landlord as soon as possible when repairs are needed
  • Tenants may be responsible for maintaining gardens, smoke alarms and light bulbs.
  • Generally, tenants in a periodic tenancy or who are leaving after a fixed – term lease must give the landlord three weeks notice. This doesn’t always apply.
  • Tenants who break the lease clause may be required to pay six – weeks worth of rent or pay rent until a new tenant is found. However, limits may apply.
  • Landlords can’t evict a tenant/s without a proper reason

Western Australia

  • Landlords can only increase rents for fixed – term tenants outlined in the tenancy agreement, with details on how they’re calculated.
  • Landlords can increase rents after giving tenants sixty days notice
  • Rents can increase at six month intervals
  • Within 30 days, tenants can approach the Magistrates Court to dispute rent increases
  • All rental properties must be in reasonable condition
  • Rentals need to have adequate safety and security: secure locks on doors and windows, outside lights, window fittings and working smoke alarms
  • Landlords are responsible for urgent maintenance. They must comply with building and health and safety regulations
  • Landlords are responsible for mould and mildew caused by faulty gutters, lack of ventilation or other faulty fixtures
  • Tenants are held responsible for any damage they cause. They must arrange (and pay for) those repairs
  • For tenants with fixed – term leases, landlords must give tenants thirty – days’ notice if they don’r ppt want to renew the lease
  • For those in peroidic tenancies, landlords must give tenants thirty days’ notice if they’re selling the property. If they are ending the tenancy without valid reason, landlords must give tenants sixty days’ notice
  • If a tenant wants to end a fixed – term tenancy, they must give the landlord thirty days’ notice. If a tenant wants to end a periodic tenancy, they must give the landlord twenty – one days’ notice.

South Australia

  • Rents can only be increased once a year
  • Tenants must be given sixty days’ notice before rents are raised
  • If the tenant believes that a rent rise is excessive, they can contact the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
  • In a fixed – term agreement, any rent increases must be outlined in the document
  • Landlords must provide a clean and safe home for tenants
  • Repairs that the landlord are responsible for include:
    • Satisfactory kitchen and bathroom
    • Plumbing, gas and electricity
    • Access to natural lighting and ventilation
  • Landlords and tenants are both responsible for maintenance. Landlords are usually responsible for: replacing blown light bulbs, tap filters, garden work like pruning fruit trees. They also responsible for general repairs and must carry such repairs in a timely manner. Landlords must also keep homes free of mould.
  • Tenants are responsible for: cleaning air conditioner filters and general garden maintenance
  • To end a fixed – term lease, the landlord or tenant need to give the other party twenty – eight day notice. If no notice is given in the timeframe, the tenancy continues as a periodic lease.
  • When a tenant wants to end a periodic lease, the tenant must give three weeks (21 days) or a month notice if the rent is paid monthly. If a landlord wants to end a tenancy for no reason, they must give the tenant 90 days’ notice (for a periodic lease). If a landlord plans to live in, demolish it, do major renovations or want to sell their property, they need to give tenants sixty days’ notice.

Tasmania

  • Rents can increase once a year
  • Landlords are required to give tenants sixty days noticed before they increase rent
  • Rents can be increased in a fixed term, only if it’s explicitly outlined in the lease
  • If tenants believe a rent increase is excessive, they can apply a review through the Residential Tenancy Commission
  • Rental properties must be waterproof, clean and in good condition
  • Rental properties must have:
    • a functioning toilet
    • kitchens that have a stove top, oven, sink and hot and cold running water
    • Safe and functioning power points. Electrical wires need to be behind walls or in the ceiling
    • Adequate lighting ( natural and/ or artificial)
    • Fixed heater — wood or heat pump — in the main living area
    • Blinds/ curtains
    • Adequate ventilation
  • Landlords are responsible for maintenance. They must ensure the property remains in a satisfactory condition. Tenants must notify the landlord of repairs needed within seven days.
  • Fixed period leases: if landlord wants to end a tenancy, they must give tenants 42 – 60 days notice
  • Non – fixed lease: landlord must give tenant forty – two days’ notice that property will be sold, leased out to another person, renovated, no longer a rental property or a family member is set to move in

Northern Territory

  • Landlords can increase rents once every six months
  • Landlords must give tenants at least thirty days’ written notice before raising rent
  • Landlords can only raise the rent if it’s stated in the lease
  • Tenants can apply to the tribunal if they think the rent rise is excessive
  • Properties must be habitable
  • Landlords must ensure everything is in reasonable state of repair
  • Landlords must adhere to health and safety regulations
  • Landlords must ensure that properties have secure locks and other security measures
  • Landlords must ensure rental properties are livable, allowing wear and tear
  • Landlords are responsible for:
    • Burst pipes
    • Blocked toilets
    • Breakdown of services that are essential
  • To end a fixed – term lease, landlords and tenants must give the other party at least two weeks (14 days) notice
  • For periodic leases, tenants must give at least two weeks (14 days) notice
  • However, if a landlord wants to end a periodic lease, they must give tenants six weeks (42 days) notice

Who do these State/ Territory regulations benefit?

At the bottom of the article, commenters alleged that when they complained to their State’s/ Territory’s legal body, they were evicted. Other conmenters lamented that the laws favour the tenants

While working on this post, here is the conclusion I’ve come up with. Australia has been behind in housing development. Australia isn’t ready for mass migration. That is not the fault of those who choose to live here. It’s the fault of governments.

Laws surrounding rental properties need to change. I believe they must be clear, fair to landlords and tenants and nationwide.

What do you think is contributing to Australia’s rental crisis? What do you think can fix it? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary

ADHD diagnoses are rising. Should people with the condition join the NDIS?

Image: Ildar Abulkhanov, iStock

Should treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) be covered under the National Disability Insurance Scheme?

According to Sydney Morning Herald, mental health professionals are pressuring Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese to include ADHD on the NDIS.

In July, psychologists and psychiatrists attended a Senate Committee arguing for more people with ADHD be included on the NDIS. Currently, over 800,000 children have an ADHD diagnosis. Only 5,000 currently access the NDIS.

According to SMH’s Natassia Chrysanthos, in the past five years, the number of Australians being medicated for ADHD has more than doubled. Figures show that more than 400,000 people take medication for the neurodevelopmental disorder. Awareness and education have been attributed to the spike.

That’s a huge spike!

What the Senate Inquiry recommended

Corner of Australian green Medicare card showing Medicare logo. Calculator and Australian money notes in the background.
Image: robymac, iStock

So, why are psychologists and psychiatrists pushing for more children with ADHD be put on the NDIS?

Because Medicare has proven to be grossly inadequate. Waiting lists are too long and too many parents can’t afford to get their children assessed or treated.

The Senate Inquiry recommended changes the Medicare and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS).

The findings recommended a nationwide approach to treatment and research:

It is clear that a more consistent and coordinated approach is needed across government systems to ensure these systems are accessible to people with ADHD.

Other submissions pointed out the need for access to Occupational Therapists (OTs), psychologists and speech therapists.

Adult ADHD and potential risks

ADHD is often looked down upon. Some people say that it ‘wasn’t a thing’ ten years ago.

Often, ADHD is stereotyped as children (particularly boys), misbehaving. However, there is a lot more to ADHD. And it can have devastating consequences if not managed properly.

Potential risks for adults with unmanaged ADHD can include:

1. Car accidents and dangerous behaviour: According to Very Well Mind, adults with ADHD can be easily distracted while driving. People with ADHD are also more prone to risk – taking behaviour, such as speeding.

2. Anxiety: According to Very Well Health, people with ADHD often suffer from anxiety. The comorbidity rate is around 50%.

3. Substance use disorder: Many studies show that adults with ADHD are likely to be addicted to nicotine. They are 50% more likely than the general population to have a drug or alcohol use disorder.

4. Difficulties in the workplace: Adults face many issues in the workplace, especially around staying on task and communicating.

5. Difficulty in self – esteem, emotional regulations and relationships: People with ADHD often struggle with self – esteem, emotional regulation and relationships.

In romantic relationships, people with ADHD may be able to ‘mask’ their symptoms initially. However, the longer a relationship goes on, hyper focusing on a partner may turn to ignoring.

Due to low self – esteem, people with ADHD may constantly seek out reassurance from their partner/s. They may constantly question their partner/s’ love and commitment. This can put a strain on the relationship, as trust slowly erodes away.

What is the answer?

I have sympathy for people with conditions like ADHD. I’m all for early diagnosis and intervention. People with ADHD deserve to get the support they need.

However, I’m not sure that increasing the number of participants on the NDIS is the answer. Many people with neurodivergence and/ or mental illnesses have been let down badly by the National Disability Insurance Agency already.

I think fixing Medicare, making psychology free and accessible is a potential answer. Trying to fit more and more people on the NDIS will only end badly.

What do you think? Should people with ADHD have access to the NDIS? Or is there another solution? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

Categories
Opinion/Commentary

ABC calls out abuse against Patricia Karvelas

Trigger warning: this post discusses cyber – bullying. If this is triggering for you, please take care. Feel free to skip this post.

Earlier this month, ABC’s News Director, Justin Stevens condemned trolls for abusing Radio National’s Patricia Karvelas. The abuse Karvelas experienced was largely sexualised, racist and homophobic.

It is disturbing, saddening and angering that Patricia should find herself the target of online trolling and abuse, much of it sexualised, homophobic and racist…

Effects of cyber – bullying

I can’t say I’m a massive Karvelas fan. Honestly, I don’t listen to Radio National. However, I’m vehemently against bullying, including cyber – bullying.

Everyone should know the potentially devastating effects of online bullying. These can include:

  • Guilt and feeling like the abuse is your fault
  • Hopelessness
  • Sadness and anxiousness
  • Feeling unsafe and
  • Shame, humiliation and embarrassment

What makes cyber- bullying worse than other forms of bullying is that it can be pervasive. It follows the victim home, any time day or night.

Homophobia

Image: Wirestock, iStock

I can’t believe homophobia is still an issue in Australia.

Karvelas has been a journalist since 2003. She started as a cadet reporter in Canberra.

Until recently, Karvelas was in the closet about her sexual orientation and the gender of her partner. She was particularly wary of anti – LGBTQ+ politicians. I don’t blame her for not wanting to be open about her sexuality back then.

Twenty years later, we’ve progressed. Same – sex marriage has been legal in Australia since 2017. Attempts to water down anti – discrimination protections have (so far) been shot down.

Yet, homophobia is obviously still an issue.

In my opinion, bullying based on sexual orientation is one of the worst forms of emotional bullying.

It’s an attack on a person’s core. The threat of being discriminated against or attacked based on sexual orientation just leaves people closeted. The ability to trust disappears and it can take a long time to get it back.

Karvelas has already battled that fear. She shouldn’t have to keep fighting it in 2023.

Racism

Image: Shutter2U, iStock

Karvelas has also allegedly faced racist abuse. For those who don’t know, Karvelas is of Greek descent.

Surely, we all know how terrible and how wrong racism is. Haven’t people learned from the aftermath of the Adam Goodes’ saga in 2015? I know people have different views on Goodes. However, I think clear that racist bullying played a part in ending his AFL career. AFL’s Executive Officer, Gillon McLachlan expressed regret on the AFL’s inaction against the abuse.

In the years since, racism has been in Australia’s consciousness. When AFL spectators abused former Adelaide Crows star, Eddie Betts in 2020, it was condemned immediately. That’s how it should be.

I can’t say it enough. No one deserves to be bullied. Everyone deserves to be safe at home, work and online.

If this post has brought up any issues for you and you’re in Australia, you can contact:

Lifeline: 13 11 14

Beyond Blue: 1300 224 636

If you are in immediate danger, call 000 (or your national emergency number).